Ukrainian tankers compared Russian tanks with NATO tanks, Abrams and Leopard. In his resume. – Forum

1. Every tank is shootable, this is an axiom.

2. Leopard and Abam are more difficult to destroy than Russian tanks. NATO tanks have protection that Russian tanks do not have.

3. Comparing Leopard and Abrams with Russian tanks is like comparing Mercedes with Moskvich.

4. Leopard and Abrams technologies allow tankers to see Russian tanks much earlier than Leopard or Abrams. Respectively, if there is a mountain between the Russian and Ukrainian tanks, the Russians cannot see the Leopard/Abrams, but the Leopard or Abrams can see the Russians and can even destroy them.

5. Russian occupier tanks have no chance against Leopard or Abrams. Russian tanks will lose. Russians use technology of the last century.

6. Returning to point one – any tank can be destroyed, however, there are significant differences between Russian tanks and Leopard or Abrams. For Russian tanks, the ammunition is located where the crew is. If a Javelin hits one, the ammunition detonates, the tank, the several-ton turret, is thrown into the air and flies freely for over a hundred meters, while the Russian tankmen are fried. There is no way for the crew to survive. Leopard and Abrams are different, the ammunition is separated, located separately, therefore, as a result of a missile hit, there will be no detonation of the ammunition. The tank will be shot, but the crew will survive, leave the tank.

I just hope that the Russian tankers don’t take Sharik with them? Pes Rudy is not guilty, he bites the fascists